Brandsmith Panel lets you assemble a panel of AI models from different providers, direct a structured conversation between them, and walk away with a synthesis that captures what was agreed, contested, and still unresolved.
The core risk here isn't technical — it's organisational. Most teams lack the governance structures to use this responsibly at scale.
I'd push back on that. The tooling has caught up. The bigger blocker is a skills gap, not a governance gap — and that's solvable in months, not years.
Both points miss the competitive pressure. Organisations that wait for governance maturity will simply be outrun by those who move first and iterate.
Already have a Brandsmith account? Your credentials work here too.
Most AI tools give you one perspective. Panel gives you a structured argument — and forces the models to reckon with each other.
Pick 2–5 models from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google. Give each a name and a role, or let them speak as themselves.
Panelists respond one at a time, each seeing what came before. Turns are deliberate — not simultaneous noise.
Close the panel and generate a structured summary: what the models agreed on, where they diverged, and what remains open.
Name your panelists and reuse them across sessions. Consistent voices emerge — and get better with each appearance.
The best thinkers don't ask for one opinion — they stress-test ideas across perspectives. Panel brings that discipline to AI.
Start your first panel